L-R: Mark Van Beeumen MSC, Ton Zwart MSC and Con O'Connell MSC

Wednesday 13 July 2011

The cost of immigration

Last Saturday I attended an Immigration Seminar in the Anglican Church of Birchfield, the border area between Aston and Perry Barr. The seminar was organised by the Jamaica Diaspora for the West Midlands and attracted an attendance of over a hundred people. It was not surprising, given the name of the organising group, that mostly people from Jamaican descent attended the seminar. What was amazing to me, however, was that the seminar ended by singing the national anthem of Jamaica!

I learned a lot during the seminar. The main speakers were from the UK Border Agency [UKBA] and a barrister from London and not to forget the voices from the audience who had their questions ready and made their comments. An MP was also present but after a short speech he disappeared prompting the reaction: why is it that politicians never stay around to answer questions? The reply was: it is one of those days with plenty of events to attend and, please, here is my phone number, don't hesitate to call me. In the meantime the politician had revealed that 60% of the people calling on him during surgeries bring up immigration issues and that their greatest grievance is the high fee for citizenship, over £800 for a single adult and over £500 for children under 18 years of age. These amounts are simply too much for a family with a number of children.

Two other main issues surfaced during the discussions: overstaying or becoming an illegal and problems in bringing in dependents from Jamaica. It turned out that the barrister and the representative of UKBA were not always on the same line. UKBA is an enforcement agency and implements government immigration policy. Within this framework it tries to be of service to people who have got into difficulties because they failed to extend their visa or did not renew their passports. It takes into account that lack of money may be the underlying reason for not applying again for these documents, but it cannot extend a leave to remain for reasons of poverty. It cannot do more than act humanely because of family circumstances, as the law allows, or provide assistance in case of voluntary return to the home country.

The barrister represents clients and fights for their interests by challenging the rules and regulations of the government in court. One weapon is article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is stronger than paragraph 395c of the Immigration Rules. Both consider the importance of family and private life, but the one in the context of human rights and the other in the context of humane treatment by the Border Agency, which is discretionary.

Money again emerged while talking about bringing in one's dependents from Jamaica. Two requirements make it difficult for poor people to be reunited with their families. They need to have a sufficient number of rooms in their house to accommodate children of different gender ten years and older who require separate rooms by law. And they need to have a weekly income high enough to maintain their dependents without recourse to public funds. To bring in a spouse would need an income of no less that £101 a week. The audience was told in no uncertain terms: get your mathematics right before you make an application.

The vicar of the church where the seminar was held had her own contribution to make. We have to listen to what people in the street have to say and: the church is meaningless without addressing the issues of the underclass.

Ton

Friday 1 July 2011

Take That


Monday and Tuesday, June 27 and 28, saw the biggest crowds ever flocking to Aston. Nearly 1000,000 people, mostly women, attended the two concerts given by Take That in Villa Park, the football grounds of Aston Villa.

Weeks before the event all residents of Aston received and A4 in their letter-box advising them about the invasion that was going to happen and apologising in advance for any inconvenience it may cause. In our area it was not bad. We could hear the music in the distance but for people living closer to the stadium it must have been a lot worse. Walking over to the football grounds through Aston Park I could feel the vibrations of the bass tones in my body while still on the slope downhill. But then the concert was not an all-night affair: the official opening was at 7:00 o'clock and all had ended before 11:00.

What was more disturbing, at least to some residents, was the closure of roads around Villa Park, not only on the days of the concerts but also before and after to build up the huge stage and take it down again. The traffic was diverted along alternative routes but these were not built to accommodate the number of vehicles in such a short time. The problem was mainly felt after the concerts, when everyone wanted to rush home. It took a few hours to clear the traffic, longer than is the case for Aston Villa at home matches.

It may seem strange but I had never heard of Take That before the events of this week. I did not live in England when they first gained popularity in the nineties and besides my interest in pop and rock music has never been great. Anyway I was told that the band broke up and has been reconstituted, so to say, the last one joining again being Robbie Williams, who "was fabulous", according to my spokeswoman.

Concerts like these do not come cheap. The woman just quoted paid no less than £55 for a ticket, which was neither the cheapest nor the most expensive. All in all the concerts generated an awful lot of money and I wonder how much of it ends up in Aston. Taxi drivers had a busy evening; there were plenty of them going to and fro Villa Park. Also the eateries had lots of customers. But I guess that these are just the crumbs that fell from the table of the rich. This is not to complain: Aston was in the news and what is more it was in a positive way.

Ton